Search
Close this search box.

DB consultation: what will a stronger Regulator mean for trustees?

The DWP’s proposals are welcomed in terms of their efforts to create a stronger Regulator. Contributor Faith Dickson. The key to success will be to focus on making sure that their powers are clear and that they can be used quickly, to ensure that the new regime operates as intended.
gdpr

The DWP’s proposals are welcomed in terms of their efforts to create a stronger Regulator. Contributor Faith Dickson, Partner – Sackers

The key to success will be to focus on making sure that their powers are clear and that they can be used quickly, to ensure that the new regime operates as intended.

TPR’s powers are set to be considerably strengthened in three core areas:

Notifiable events framework – while the proposals may have captured certain recent high-profile cases, we would question if they will provide the broader early warning system that is needed. The key here is for any changes to enable trustees to access information more quickly, which in turn should lead to better communication between employers, TPR and trustees.

Declaration of intent – in an ideal scenario, open dialogue and information sharing will already be in place where possible.  But there is a risk that for some employers the proposed requirement could become just another tick-box compliance routine, with the result that declarations will fail to have the desired impact. In practice, open and timely dialogue between trustees and TPR can be effective in addressing concerns.

Improved Regulator powers – while we recognise that TPR and trustees always having relevant, up-to-date information is difficult to police, we believe that more specific disclosure powers, supported by the proposed new offences, could help strengthen the trustee position when seeking information from employers. When decisions could potentially impact on the employer covenant, such as dividend payments or transactions, it would be helpful for trustees to be able to require underlying information before the events take place, ensuring well-informed decisions. We would also suggest that any new fines would need to be in addition to the existing penalty regime, to genuinely act as a deterrent, and that greater clarity as to when TPR’s powers are to be used is needed.

“This consultation proposes a radical overhaul of TPR’s powers which, if implemented in their existing form, would raise the stakes considerably for all employers and trustees involved in occupational pension schemes. The impact of the new powers is highly dependent on careful and clear drafting, in order to avoid unintended consequences. TPR’s resources and its ability and appetite to use any new powers will also be crucial.”


Receive more HR related news and content with our monthly Enewsletter (Ebrief)

Read more

Latest News

Read More

The allyship revolution: 8 tips for building allies with impact

26 March 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £32,332 to £38,205 pa, pro rata

University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £29,605 to £33,966 pa, pro rata

University of Oxford – Blavatnik School of GovernmentSalary: Grade 5: £28,759 – £33,966 per annum (with a discretionary range to £37,099)

Software Development Director (Exec Team Seat). Remote Working with Ellesmere Port Office-Based Minimum 1 Day Per Week. + Contribution towards membership fees. £120,000 – £140,000

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE