Search
Close this search box.

Removing unconscious bias

We know that bias can be harmful and is a problem for many companies. But, how do we stop bias if those involved aren’t aware they’re doing it? In my article, I will explore the concept of uncon¬scious bias, how it affects organisations and their staff, and how to stop it from influenc¬ing your view of performance.

We know that bias can be harm­ful and is a problem for many companies. But, how do we stop bias if those involved aren’t aware they’re doing it? In my article, I will explore the concept of uncon­scious bias, how it affects organ­i­sa­tions and their staff, and how to stop it from influenc­ing your view of performance.

What’s the problem?
We have seen an uplift in the num­ber of companies mak­ing com­mit­ments to tack­ling systemic bias and inequal­i­ty, and efforts made by many groups to raise aware­ness of the issues. However, the real­i­ty is that there still some way to go, and the num­bers paint a stark picture.

Research by the Cen­tre for Social Inves­ti­ga­tion in 2019, in which thou­sands of fake appli­ca­tions were sent out for real jobs, showed appli­cants from minor­i­ty groups need­ed to send 60% more appli­ca­tions to receive as many call-backs. This research used a num­ber of ​“fake” can­di­date pro­files, vary­ing the minor­i­ty back­ground of the can­di­dates, but keep­ing expe­ri­ence and qual­i­fi­ca­tions constant.

These out­comes are of course not inten­tion­al, but the result of build­ing sys­tems (in this case a recruit­ment process) that rely on human judge­ment of others. We have our own bias, that is shaped by our back­ground and upbring­ing, and which we uncon­scious­ly apply all the time. It’s this uncon­scious bias which – when left unchal­lenged – cre­ates the out­comes we see.

As uncom­fort­able as it sounds, this is the real­i­ty that we real­ly need to tack­le if we are going to tru­ly bring about change.

How does this affect organisations?
By stand­ing back and look­ing at a process through an inclu­siv­i­ty lens, we can start to see some of the issues with­in the sys­tems we have built, and when you do that you will start to realise that our chal­lenge goes far beyond the hir­ing engine. Any deci­sion point in an organ­i­sa­tion where judge­ments are made about peo­ple will face the same sys­temic issues.

One of these is how we think about employ­ee per­for­mance. Many per­for­mance man­age­ment approach­es rely on man­agers mak­ing judge­ments about peo­ple, which we know will be influenced by uncon­scious bias, which may result in us misiden­ti­fy­ing Tal­ent altogether.

Work­place Psy­chol­o­gist Ian MacRae explains ​“Com­pa­nies that hire or pro­mote based on super­fi­cial and irrel­e­vant char­ac­ter­is­tics put them­selves at a com­pet­i­tive dis­ad­van­tage. Ignor­ing top tal­ent and high poten­tial because of uncon­scious bias cre­ates a leaky and inef­fi­cient tal­ent pipeline.”

A tru­ly diverse work­place means a wider vari­ety of opinions, skills, points of view and ways of work­ing which boosts pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and cre­ativ­i­ty in a company. There is lots of research that demon­strates that more diverse busi­ness­es are like­ly to have much bet­ter organ­i­sa­tion­al per­for­mance, so remov­ing sub­jec­tiv­i­ty from the busi­ness should be a board lev­el pri­or­i­ty. Why would you restrict your organ­i­sa­tion by main­tain­ing process­es which have result­ed in hav­ing a poor lev­els of representation?

The impact of a cul­ture which includes sub­jec­tive ways of rat­ing and reward­ing work­ers affects every­one. That’s because peo­ple don’t real­ly know what is expect­ed of them, and as the out­come is based on opin­ion and per­son­al feel­ing, there is a chance peo­ple will per­ceive the out­comes as unfair.

How can we solve this?
The answer to these issues is in the data.

“Good selec­tion and reten­tion poli­cies are like good sci­ence: deci­sions should be based on the best avail­able evi­dence and data, while per­son­al bias­es are under­stood but not used for deci­sion-mak­ing.” Ian MacRae, Work­place Psychologist.

Con­fronting bias can be uncom­fort­able – mak­ing man­agers aware of how their uncon­scious bias affects deci­sions around per­for­mance is a dif­fi­cult but nec­es­sary exer­cise. Using data to informs deci­sions can help by firstly iden­ti­fying groups of peo­ple and areas with­in the business that have been dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly affect­ed by bias; and secondly to pro­vide a fair­er frame­work for mea­sur­ing per­for­mance going forward.

With this in mind, now is the time to con­sid­er the role of a tra­di­tion­al per­for­mance mea­surement approach, which involves ask­ing man­agers for a pre­dom­i­nant­ly sub­jec­tive opin­ion annually, and whether it’s the most appro­pri­ate way of think­ing about per­for­mance mea­surement. A performance snapshot enables you to ask man­agers very spe­cif­ic, detailed focussed ques­tions around per­for­mance and devel­op­ment at dif­fer­ent points in time.

This in turn enables you to cre­ate real, action­able insight and data required for a true assessment of per­for­mance and potential. Bias is a part of our human expe­ri­ence so we need to get com­fort­able with being uncom­fortable and address our bias­es to remove them from deci­sion mak­ing and trust the data.

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    AI’s Impact on the Workplace: A Survey of American Managers

    27 March 2024

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £32,332 to £38,205 pa, pro rata

    University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £29,605 to £33,966 pa, pro rata

    University of Oxford – Blavatnik School of GovernmentSalary: Grade 5: £28,759 – £33,966 per annum (with a discretionary range to £37,099)

    Software Development Director (Exec Team Seat). Remote Working with Ellesmere Port Office-Based Minimum 1 Day Per Week. + Contribution towards membership fees. £120,000 – £140,000

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE