Search
Close this search box.

Pension contributions too low despite auto-enrolment success

Pension contributions too low despite auto-enrolment success

Auto-enrolment has forced many employees, supported by their employers, to begin saving for their retirement.

The minimum contribution of 1 percent plus 1 percent is not sufficient and we need to get to the more substantial 12 percent figure that Frank Field first proposed all those years ago. A barrage of recent reports demonstrating how meagre the Nation’s savings are proves just how difficult it is to provide for today while planning for tomorrow.

Knowledge is still power. Employees need to understand more about retirement and be taught simple concepts. The Government is going to pay somewhere around £8,000 pa once a person reaches the ever rising state pension age. Some find this sufficient, but it may mean that many sacrifice previous standards of living which are no longer affordable. If the State cannot provide sufficient retirement income savers will need help from employers to plan for the future to the best of their ability. Simple lessons like thinking about how to invest inheritance could help bridge that gap.

Constant legislative change compounds the challenges faced by those trying to save. We need a period of no political interference as the majority of employees still find pensions too complex and difficult to understand. Publicity for schemes such as BHS and Tata Steel does not help as many employees don’t understand the difference between defined benefit and defined contribution pensions.

The Government’s proposed Lifetime ISA will muddy the waters still further. A confused public does not need more choice. Savers will require significant education to fully grasp the implications of the LISA to ensure they don’t opt for it over valuable auto-enrolment driven employer pension contributions.” 

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Rise in recruitment fraud must urgently be checked

28 March 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £32,332 to £38,205 pa, pro rata

University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £29,605 to £33,966 pa, pro rata

University of Oxford – Blavatnik School of GovernmentSalary: Grade 5: £28,759 – £33,966 per annum (with a discretionary range to £37,099)

Software Development Director (Exec Team Seat). Remote Working with Ellesmere Port Office-Based Minimum 1 Day Per Week. + Contribution towards membership fees. £120,000 – £140,000

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE