- Homepage
- Human Resources Jobs
- Human Resources Features
- Human Resources News
- HR director Interview
- HR Legal Updates
- HR eNewsletters
- Movers & Shakers in HR
- Human Resources Events
- HR Supplier Directory
- HR Book Reviews
- Members' Area
- Recommend A Friend
- Subscribe
- HR Roundtables
- About us
- Editorial Information
- Editorial Panel
- Strategic Partners
- Testimonials
- Advertise
- Terms
- Careers with us
- Contact us
theHRDIRECTOR Issue 69This issue we speak to
James Dalgleish
Head of HR - London Fire Brigade
- Special Report
- Interim Management
- Retention
- Reward & Recognition
- Leadership
- Hays Human Resources
- Northgate Arinso
- Mind
- QVC
- New Balance
Default retirement at 65 - is it legal?
Default retirement at 65 - is it legal?
Unfortunately we will have to wait just a bit longer to find out. In October 2006, the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (known as the Age Regulations) came into force, introducing a standard default retirement age of 65. The Heyday Group (part of Age Concern) challenged the Age Regulations in the High Court in what has become known as the ‘Heyday Challenge', seeking to make it unlawful in the UK to force employees to retire at any age.
In July 2007, the Heyday case was referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) by the High Court and in March 2009, the ECJ finally handed down its decision, ruling that a national rule permitting compulsory retirement at 65 or over, can be, in principle, justified. However, the ECJ has bounced its decision back to the High Court, and it is now up to the High Court to decide the following:
- whether compulsory retirement at 65 can be justified by the UK by a legitimate aim relating to employment policy, the UK's labour market and vocational training; and
- whether the Government's chosen way of achieving that legitimate aim by imposing a default retirement age is appropriate and necessary.
Until the High Court has made its decision, the situation remains unclear. Over 800 cases have been stayed at Employment Tribunals whilst we await a definitive ruling.
The implications of the Heyday challenge could have a significant impact on employers. If the default retirement age is quashed by the High Court, all employers will need to revert back to the position before the Age Regulations came into force. As a consequence, all stayed claims are likely to succeed and claimants will be entitled to compensation accordingly, unless their retirement can be objectively justified by the employer.
For now, the Age Regulations remain in force as drafted, at least until the High Court has given its decision, and employers can continue to require employees to retire at age 65 or above. However, it is good practice for employers to discuss retirement options with employees, and to avoid forcing them to retire before they are ready.
If employers are considering making any compulsory retirements, it is important that the following retirement notification provisions of the Age Regulations are complied with:
- Give the employee written notice, 6-12 months before the intended retirement date, and inform them of their right to request to continue to work
- If you fail to comply with the time limit, then you must give written notice as soon as possible. Unfortunately, you may still be liable for compensation of up to eight weeks of the employee's pay (subject to a statutory cap of £350 for a week's pay) for the delay. Failure to give the employee written notice 14 days before the intended date of retirement will render the dismissal automatically unfair and you will be liable for further compensation
- The employee can request to work beyond the intended date of retirement, and the request should be made 3 months before the intended date of retirement. However, if you have failed to comply with your time limit for written notification, the employee can submit their request at any time up to the intended date of retirement
- If the employee makes a request to continue working, you must either agree in full or arrange a meeting within a reasonable time to discuss it with the employee. The employee has the right to be accompanied to the meeting
- You must inform the employee of your decision in writing and of their right to appeal. You cannot make a retirement dismissal without giving notification of your decision
- If the employee exercises their right to appeal, you must hold another meeting within a reasonable time and inform the employee of your decision in writing
- If you decide to refuse the employee's request, then the retirement dismissal should take place on the intended date of retirement. You are not required to give reasons for your decision, although you must ensure that your reasons for the dismissal are not discriminatory
- If you agree to allow the employee to work beyond their retirement, you should agree a new retirement date. There is no need to follow a further procedure at the date of retirement if the new date for retirement is 6 months or less away, but if it more than 6 months away, you will have to restart the retirement process
- If no date is set then you can still retire the employee at a later stage by following the above procedure again
- Ensure you set out the arrangements in writing, and agree the terms on which the employment will continue (if they have changed).
Irrespective of the outcome of the Heyday challenge, the Government has pledged to review the effectiveness of the default retirement age in 2011. With the uncertainty surrounding the current economic climate, many of us simply cannot afford to stop working at 65. In addition, the population is living longer, and many employees are fit well into old age or do not have the cushion of valuable pensions which would otherwise provide a strong incentive to retire. With that in mind, it is not unfeasible that employers may see the default retirement age increased to say 70 or abolished altogether.
Tina Wisener is a Partner at Doyle Clayton Solicitors


