- Homepage
- Human Resources Jobs
- Human Resources Features
- Human Resources News
- HR director Interview
- HR Legal Updates
- HR eNewsletters
- Movers & Shakers in HR
- Human Resources Events
- HR Supplier Directory
- HR Book Reviews
- Members' Area
- Recommend A Friend
- Subscribe
- HR Roundtables
- About us
- Editorial Information
- Editorial Panel
- Strategic Partners
- Testimonials
- Advertise
- Terms
- Careers with us
- Contact us
theHRDIRECTOR Issue 69This issue we speak to
James Dalgleish
Head of HR - London Fire Brigade
- Special Report
- Interim Management
- Retention
- Reward & Recognition
- Leadership
- Hays Human Resources
- Northgate Arinso
- Mind
- QVC
- New Balance
Leadership, the fine balance
The balance between Andrew Strauss and Andrew Flintoff seemed to work well, with Strauss the cool and steady decision maker, and Flintoff the one with moments of brilliance and times of underperformance. Christian Hasenoehrl, Partner at Gallup, steps up to the crease.
How common is this in business? Take a look at any FTSE 100 organisation and the safe bet is that you will not have a Leadership Team with a consistent make up of five to 15 well rounded generalists with vast levels of experience and consistency in their management style. Indeed, not even the CEO is always selected for their management talent versus their years of running other large organisations.
In fact, more often than not, companies do not apply a terribly objective approach to leadership selection. Often leaders have extreme personalities or particular strengths, experiences or knowledge in certain areas that made the difference for the search committee. The most successful companies that we have studied, however, implement an objective approach to leadership development, selection and succession planning that includes a focus on strengths, and a combination of knowledge, skills, experience and talent.
Clearly certain benchmarks must exist. A retailer may find that someone with ten years operating experience makes for a better chief executive than someone that has never operated in a retail environment, but equally there are many candidates with that particular experience.
How do you differentiate from so many qualified candidates? We have found through partnership with our clients and in interviews with over 47,000 C-Level executives from over 200 organisations worldwide that leaders require strong talent in five core areas which I'll call: direction, drive, influence, relationship and execution.
Our research shows that leaders who are clear about the level of each of their leadership talents and who work to enhance their leadership strengths have a significant impact on wider business results. Similarly, understanding aspects of leadership that are less natural and how to best manage these aspects forms the basis of personal leadership effectiveness.
How do you fine-tune a diverse leadership team? First and foremost, you must understand the talent profile of each of the individuals, and equally of the team. For instance, if only one exhibits strength in the Direction theme then it will become crucial to replace that person with someone that is equally equipped to provide strong guidance to the team.
If all five are talented in providing direction but they lack a balance in relationship or influence then how will the team ever reach a consensus? Five leaders running in five different directions does not often work out. What we have found is that the best leadership teams have a strong balance of these five attributes. Leaders can come from all different backgrounds, but paring them with individuals that can complement their extreme talents is not just crucial, it is necessary for survival and for succession planning. So a star player with lots of drive like Flintoff will truly shine with some guidance from a manager with direction and execution, like Strauss.
Christian Hasenoehrl, Partner at Gallup
