Calls for employment tribunal reform
Calls for employment tribunal reform
A radical overhaul of employment tribunal procedure
and administration is being proposed as HR professionals contend with a rising
tide of claims from disgruntled employees.
There has been a massive hike in the number of claims accepted by employment tribunals in the past year. The 56 percent rise reported this month (July) by the Tribunal Services for 2009-10, is the highest ever level involving 236,100 claims, up from 151,000. The soaring claims rate provides the backdrop to mounting concern among employment lawyers throughout the UK about the consistency of approach, efficiency and quality of tribunal services.
Three months before the release of the latest tribunal figures, ELA (Employment Lawyers Association) embarked on a major survey among its 5,500 members to gain a detailed grass-roots view of what was happening. The survey results published today (Thurs) identify key areas of concern and make positive proposals for reforms, which would help to improve efficiency thus saving time and cost for employers, claimants, government and advisers alike.
ELA's proposals acknowledge the spirit of radical change and budget tightening being pursued by the coalition government as it seeks to dramatically pare down public sector fixed and operational costs. At the same time, government consultation around merging the tribunal and courts services is underway. ELA is concerned that opportunities to achieve employment tribunal-specific improvements should not be missed.
Survey poll: ELA received around a 20 percent response to its survey, when taking into account that some people replied on behalf of employment teams within firms not just as individuals. 81 percent of respondents work in private practice. Responses came from lawyers practising in, and with experience of employment tribunals in, all English regions, as well as in Scotland and Wales.
Survey headlines:
56 percent of respondents
had experienced a decline in service received from Employment Tribunals
83 percent said the approach
around the country was not consistent
93-94 percent believed users
would benefit from greater consistency from the tribunals and judiciary in
approach, practice and procedure
78 percent agreed that
resourcing issues lay behind many difficulties
68 percent believed the
large volume of equal pay claims had skewed the work of tribunals
77 percent favoured the
creation of specialist courts to deal with equal pay claims
79 percentalso favoured
large-scale pay claims being handled by a single Employment Tribunal office
Problem areas (include)
Short notice of postponement
of substantive hearings
Delays in listing Case
Management Discussions and Pre-Hearing Reviews
Cases going part-heard
because of lack of available time
Main suggestions to achieve improvements:
Procedure
80 percent - either strongly
or fully support adoption of a menu of standard direction
72 percent - either strongly
or fully support use of a standard agenda for case management discussions (CMD)
to be completed before the CMD is held
61 percent - either strongly
or fully support agreeing a list of issues prior to CMD
77 percent - either strongly
or fully support setting a timetable for disclosure
78 percent - either strongly
or fully support having an agreed timetable and process for exchange of witness
statements
A majority favoured judges sitting alone on straightforward cases, such as unfair dismissals to ease overall pressure on the system
Administration
79 percent - either strongly
or fully support improved case tracking/ online access
80 percent - either strongly
or fully support focus on email communication from tribunals to cut down on
phone calls and post
79 percent - either strongly
or fully support using a standard agenda for CMDs and having CMDs by phone
Hearings
60 percent - either strongly or fully support listing main hearings from Monday to Thursday, reserving Fridays for CMDs and Pre-Hearing Reviews (as is common practice in the commercial court)
Only 26 percent - either strongly or fully supported "out of hours" hearings with
32 percent completely opposed to the idea
There was a 50/50 split on taking witness statements as read, with 62% being strongly or completely opposed to the idea of imposing time limits on witnesses reading out statements.
Joanne Owers, Chair of ELA, who also chaired ELA's working party on the tribunals service, said: "The dramatic escalation in claims has put employment tribunals and the tribunals service under considerable pressure. It is understandable that cracks are appearing in the system. In addition to highlighting the problem areas commonly encountered by users, ELA members have indicated very strong support for practical changes and improvements which they believe will complement the work being carried out to improve the service and deliver significant benefit to the employees and employers who use it."
22 July 2010
Human Resources news brought to you by theHRDIRECTOR ; the only independent strategic HR publication.
Created on: 22-Jul-10 15:27
© theHRDirector.com
